Program Areas
Past Events
Face-To-Face Meetings
Online Collaboration
| ESA-186-2 Public Report (Norpac Foods, Stayton) |
|
|
|
| Written by USDOE Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy | ||||||||||||
| Friday, 15 July 2011 10:00 | ||||||||||||
Page 1 of 2 ESA-186-2 Public ReportIntroduction: The Norpac Foods Stayton plant produces frozen and canned vegetable products. The plant’s operations are seasonal; 67% of the annual energy consumption occurs during the high season months of July, August, September, and October. Natural gas usage rates range from 9 MMBtu/h in the low season to 43 MMBtu/h in the high season. The plant purchases 100% of its electric demand. The average demand ranges from 2,000 kW in the low season to 6,300 kW in the high season. The plant is equipped with four natural gas-fired package boilers. Process steam uses include blanchers, cookers, retorts, and heating of sanitation water. Objective of ESA: The objective of the Energy Savings Assessment (ESA) was to:
Focus of Assessment: Boilers, steam distribution system, condensate return system, and process uses of steam Approach for ESA: The approach of the training assessment was to provide training on DOE Steam Tools suite and use them to identify and analyze potential opportunities.
General Observations of Potential Opportunities: Annual Energy Consumption: In 2006 the plant consumed 0.18 TBtu of natural gas and 30,105 MWh of electric energy.
Energy Savings Opportunities: General Considerations: The following points should be considered when evaluating the potential opportunities identified on page 1 and described below:
1 The DOE’s Steam System Assessment Tool (SSAT) includes a number of predefined energy savings opportunities common to many, but not all, industrial steam systems. The opportunities are referred to in SSAT as Projects. Project 1 is simply a reduction in facility steam demand. |
| Alternative Strategies for Low-Pressure End Uses 09/06/2010 | USDOE Office of Industrial Technologies Alternative Strategies for Low-Pressure End Uses Compressed air is expensive to produce. Because compressed air is also clean, readily available, and simple to use, it is often chosen for application [ ... ] |
Recovering Energy Cost in Compressed Air Systems 09/06/2010 | Hank van Ormer RECOVERING ENERGY COST IN COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEMS
H.P (Hank) van Ormer President Air Power USA, Inc. | Other Articles | ||
Latest Discussions
Re: Equipment for new plant
marketing1 1.4.2011 11:40
Equipment for new plant
pberko 31.3.2011 18:45
Re: The Catalyst - Archived Issues?
admin 28.6.2010 19:10



