| Reducing Product Give Away: Back to Basics |
|
|
|
| Written by Jim Seufert |
| Wednesday, 16 June 2010 14:24 |
Reducing Product Give Away: Back to Basicsby Jim Seufert One company only noticed the magnitude of their problem when trucks were over weight at the scale and had to return to off-load pallets. Another company calculated that they give away nearly $100,000 of product per year. Ensuring that buyers get the exact amount of product they have purchased is a delicate balance. To accomplish this, many processors set a target weight slightly above the label weight. For example, if the label weight is 16 ounces, the production target weight may be 16.1 ounces. The ability to consistently fill to the target weight depends on a number of variables including:
Northwest Food Processors Innovation Productivity Center (IPC) has researched this issue at a number of processors. Several key lessons have emerged:
Track Overfills Let’s revisit our previous example, where the label weight is 16 ounces and the target weight is 16.1 ounces. If production runs result in actual weights of 16.3 ounces you are overfilling each package by an average of 0.2 ounces. You can easily calculate total product give away by multiplying the 0.2 ounces over target weight by the number of packages produced. Assuming you ran 10,000 units, multiply that by 0.2 ounces = 2,000 ounces. That’s 125 pounds of product giveaway.
Communicate Impact
It’s difficult for people to understand the impact of 0.2 ounces per package. Instead, give them information that resonates – like total pounds and dollars. Review results with shift supervisors and line operators. Discuss that 10,000 unit run and inform them that the 0.2 ounce per package overfill means you gave away 125 pounds of product. If your ingredients cost $1 per pound, you gave away $125 of product. Extend that math out over your entire day, week or month. It adds up quickly.
Monitor Performance The supervisor should build awareness of the issue and encourage ownership by staff on the line. For example, the supervisor should review scale log sheets and discuss variances during each product run. If a product is proving difficult to run, they should try to solve the issue then and there. This hands-on engagement builds a culture of responsibility and accountability.
Why Bother? Contact IPC advisors Glenn Felix This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it '; document.write( '' ); document.write( addy_text48897 ); document.write( '<\/a>' ); //--> This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or Jim Seufert This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it for more information. |
Latest Discussions
Re: Equipment for new plant
marketing1 1.4.2011 11:40
Equipment for new plant
pberko 31.3.2011 18:45
Re: The Catalyst - Archived Issues?
admin 28.6.2010 19:10



